Bet OVER
7-3 O/U Record
70.0% Over Rate
3.4u Units Won
+33.6% ROI
Find Best Line

James Cook has demolished rushing yards props over his last 10 games, going 7-3 to the over with a massive +16.5 yard differential above his average line. The 70% hit rate and 33.6% ROI on overs signal a clear market inefficiency that smart bettors should exploit.

Expert Analysis

The numbers tell a compelling story about James Cook's recent rushing surge that oddsmakers haven't fully adjusted to. His 75.7 yard average significantly outpaces the 59.2 yard lines he's been receiving, creating a 16.5 yard cushion that represents genuine value rather than variance. This differential suggests Buffalo's offensive evolution has elevated Cook's role beyond what the market recognizes. The Bills' playoff push likely contributed to increased rushing volume as they leaned on Cook's reliability in crucial situations. His current three-game over streak indicates momentum rather than regression, especially considering his longest under streak was just one game. The 70% over rate across 10 games provides sufficient sample size to establish pattern validity. Most telling is the dramatic ROI split - 33.6% returns on overs versus -42.7% losses on unders - indicating this isn't a balanced trend but a systematic undervaluation. Cook's consistency appears tied to Buffalo's commitment to establishing ground control, particularly in weather-dependent late-season games. The fact that his longest under streak maxed out at one game suggests strong floor performance, while the sustained over production indicates a ceiling shift that books haven't recognized.

Betting Verdict

LEAN OVER with MEDIUM confidence. Cook's 16.5 yard differential above market expectations represents legitimate value, not random variance. The key is targeting games where Buffalo faces defensive fronts that struggle against versatile backs like Cook. Primary risk involves potential workload reduction if the Bills build commanding leads early, but their recent commitment to establishing rushing identity suggests Cook remains central to their offensive philosophy.

7 OVERS (70.0%)
3 UNDERS
0% 50% breakeven 100%

Performance vs Line

Game Log (Last 10 Games)

Date Opp Line Actual +/- Result
2025-01-26 OPP 55.5 85.0 +29.5 OVER
2025-01-19 OPP 54.5 67.0 +12.5 OVER
2025-01-12 OPP 55.5 120.0 +64.5 OVER
2024-12-29 OPP 65.5 53.0 -12.5 UNDER
2024-12-22 OPP 63.5 100.0 +36.5 OVER
2024-12-15 OPP 49.5 105.0 +55.5 OVER
2024-12-08 OPP 61.5 20.0 -41.5 UNDER
2024-12-01 OPP 64.5 107.0 +42.5 OVER
2024-11-17 OPP 57.5 20.0 -37.5 UNDER
2024-11-10 OPP 64.5 80.0 +15.5 OVER

Key Splits

Home vs Away

Home 66.7% Over
Away 75.0% Over

Favorite vs Underdog

Favorite 50.0% Over
Underdog 50.0% Over

Recent Trend

Last 5 80.0% Over
Last 10 70.0% Over

Find the Best Rushing Yards Prop Lines

Compare James Cook props across top sportsbooks.

Compare Sportsbooks

Frequently Asked Questions

What is James Cook's Rushing Yards prop record last 10 games?

James Cook has gone 7-3 to the over on rushing yards props in his last 10 games, hitting 70% of overs with an impressive 33.6% return on investment for over bettors.

Should I bet OVER or UNDER on James Cook Rushing Yards last 10 games?

Lean over on James Cook rushing yards props. His 16.5 yard average differential above lines represents genuine value, though monitor game script and weather conditions that could affect Buffalo's ground approach.

What's James Cook's average Rushing Yards last 10 games?

Cook is averaging 75.7 rushing yards over his last 10 games compared to average lines of 59.2 yards, creating a significant 16.5 yard cushion that indicates market undervaluation of his current role.

How reliable is this trend?

Target Cook rushing overs in games where Buffalo faces weaker run defenses or weather conditions favor ground control. Avoid when the Bills are heavy favorites likely to abandon rushing early.

Methodology: This analysis covers 10 games from 2024-11-10 to 2025-01-26. O/U results use closing prop lines. ROI assumes -110 juice. Pushes excluded from percentages.