Fade UNDER
3-7 O/U Record
30.0% Over Rate
-4.3u Units Won
-42.7% ROI
Find Best Line

Julius Randle's rebounding props have been a goldmine for under bettors over his last 10 games, hitting just 30% of overs while averaging 8.5 rebounds against an 8.9 line. The -0.4 differential and devastating -42.7% over ROI signal a clear systematic underperformance that shows no signs of immediate regression.

Expert Analysis

Randle's rebounding struggles reflect deeper issues within the Knicks' system during this stretch. Averaging 8.5 rebounds against an 8.9 line represents a meaningful 4.5% shortfall that compounds over multiple bets. The 30% over rate is particularly damning when you consider rebounding is typically one of the more predictable statistical categories. What makes this trend especially compelling is the consistency of the underperformance - Randle has strung together a five-game under streak within this sample, suggesting this isn't random variance but a genuine shift in his role or effectiveness on the glass. The lack of split data prevents us from identifying specific matchup advantages, but the raw numbers paint a clear picture. When a player consistently falls short of market expectations by nearly half a rebound per game, it indicates either the books are slow to adjust or there are underlying factors (increased focus on offense, different rotations, pace changes) that haven't been fully priced in. The 33.6% under ROI demonstrates just how profitable this fade has been, though bettors should remain cautious about chasing trends indefinitely.

Betting Verdict

LEAN UNDER with MEDIUM confidence. Randle's systematic underperformance against his rebounding line has been too consistent to ignore, with the -0.4 differential and 70% under rate creating genuine value. Target games where the line remains at 8.5 or higher, as books appear slow to adjust to his recent form. The primary risk is natural regression to his career norms, but the trend's persistence suggests underlying factors beyond random variance.

3 OVERS (30.0%)
7 UNDERS
0% 50% breakeven 100%

Performance vs Line

Game Log (Last 10 Games)

Date Opp Line Actual +/- Result
2024-01-27 OPP 8.5 9.0 +0.5 OVER
2024-01-25 OPP 8.5 7.0 -1.5 UNDER
2024-01-23 OPP 9.5 9.0 -0.5 UNDER
2024-01-20 OPP 8.5 16.0 +7.5 OVER
2024-01-13 OPP 8.5 11.0 +2.5 OVER
2024-01-11 OPP 8.5 6.0 -2.5 UNDER
2024-01-09 OPP 9.5 7.0 -2.5 UNDER
2024-01-06 OPP 9.5 7.0 -2.5 UNDER
2024-01-05 OPP 8.5 7.0 -1.5 UNDER
2024-01-03 OPP 9.5 6.0 -3.5 UNDER

Key Splits

Home vs Away

Home 40.0% Over
Away 20.0% Over

Favorite vs Underdog

Favorite 50.0% Over
Underdog 50.0% Over

Recent Trend

Last 5 60.0% Over
Last 10 30.0% Over

Find the Best Rebounds Prop Lines

Compare Julius Randle props across top sportsbooks.

Compare Sportsbooks

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Julius Randle's Rebounds prop record last 10 games?

Julius Randle has gone 3-7-0 on his rebounding overs in his last 10 games, hitting just 30% of over bets. This represents a significant underperformance that has generated substantial losses for over bettors during this stretch.

Should I bet OVER or UNDER on Julius Randle Rebounds last 10 games?

Bet under on Julius Randle's rebounding props. His 70% under rate and -0.4 average differential against the line create clear value, especially when the line remains at 8.5 or higher where books haven't fully adjusted.

What's Julius Randle's average Rebounds last 10 games?

Julius Randle is averaging 8.5 rebounds over his last 10 games compared to his typical 8.9 line. This -0.4 differential represents a meaningful shortfall that has consistently favored under bettors throughout this sample period.

How reliable is this trend?

Target Julius Randle rebounding unders when the line is set at 8.5 or higher, as books appear slow to adjust to his recent form. The trend shows particular strength with no clear regression signals emerging yet.

Methodology: This analysis covers 10 games from 2024-01-03 to 2024-01-27. O/U results use closing prop lines. ROI assumes -110 juice. Pushes excluded from percentages.