The data suggests caution when backing the Chicago Bulls in this spot. Since 2014, when playing as small underdog (+1 to +3), the Chicago Bulls are just 33-34-0 against the spread. That's a 0.0% win rate and a -6.0% ROI. Sharp bettors have found value fading this situation—the opposite side would have returned +6.0%.

⚠ Fade Zone
Record33-34-0
Win Rate0.0%
Sample Size67 games
ROI-6.0%
Units Won-4.0u
Time Period2014-2024

Year-by-Year Performance

SeasonRecordWin %ROI
20145-2-00.0%+36.4%
20152-1-00.0%+27.3%
20162-2-00.0%-4.5%
20173-3-00.0%-4.5%
20185-3-00.0%+19.3%
20191-6-00.0%-72.7%
20208-1-00.0%+69.7%
20212-6-00.0%-52.3%
20221-1-00.0%-4.5%
20233-3-00.0%-4.5%
20241-6-00.0%-72.7%

Why This Trend Exists

The Bulls' struggles as small underdogs stem from their tendency to play down to competition when expectations are modest. Chicago has historically been a franchise that either rises to big occasions or falters when given just enough respect to be competitive. When oddsmakers set them as slight underdogs, it signals games where they're expected to be in the mix but not necessarily favored, creating a psychological trap. This pattern reflects Chicago's inconsistent effort levels and coaching adjustments in close-spread games. The Bulls often enter these contests without the urgency that comes with being heavy underdogs, yet lack the confidence boost of being favored. Their roster construction in recent years has featured players who thrive when motivated by disrespect but struggle to maintain intensity in "pick 'em" scenarios. The franchise's defensive inconsistencies become magnified in these tight-line games, where small lapses determine outcomes. Chicago's tendency to rely on individual scoring rather than systematic execution hurts them when games come down to possession-by-possession battles that small spreads typically indicate. Bettors should be particularly cautious backing the Bulls as small underdogs in divisional games or against teams with similar records, where motivation and preparation advantages become crucial differentiators in determining both straight-up winners and spread coverage.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Chicago Bulls's ATS record as small underdog (+1 to +3)?

The Chicago Bulls have an ATS record of 33-34-0 as small underdogs (+1 to +3) from 2014-2024. This translates to a 49.3% win rate against the spread in these situations.

Is betting on the Chicago Bulls as small underdog (+1 to +3) profitable?

No, betting on the Chicago Bulls as small underdogs (+1 to +3) is not profitable. The strategy shows a -6.0% ROI over the 2014-2024 period, indicating consistent losses for bettors.

How does this compare to the league average?

This performance is slightly below the expected 50% ATS rate, though the small sample size makes it relatively close to average. The -6.0% ROI suggests underperformance compared to typical small underdog situations across the league.

FADE This Trend

The data suggests fading this situation has been profitable. Compare odds to find the best value on the other side.

Compare Sportsbook Odds

Methodology

All trends in The Archives are calculated from official game results and closing point spreads from 2014 to 2024. ROI assumes a flat $100 bet at standard -110 juice. Win rate is calculated as wins divided by total decisions (pushes excluded). A minimum of 10 games is required for a trend to be published. Data is sourced from The Odds API and verified against official league records.