Fade UNDER
3-8 O/U Record
27.3% Over Rate
-5.3u Units Won
-47.9% ROI
Find Best Line

Jeremy Peña shows a stark under bias in high-total games, hitting the over just 27.3% of the time with a brutal -0.6 differential versus the line. This 3-8-0 record represents a significant market inefficiency worth exploiting on the under side.

Expert Analysis

The numbers paint a clear picture of Jeremy Peña struggling when run expectations are elevated. His 0.45 hits per game average in high-total contests falls dramatically short of the typical 1.05 line, creating a massive 0.6 hit differential that screams market overcorrection. High-total games often feature enhanced offensive environments, yet Peña consistently underperforms these inflated expectations. This pattern suggests the market fails to properly adjust for his specific profile in run-heavy matchups. The 38.8% ROI on unders demonstrates real betting value, while the -47.9% over ROI confirms the market's persistent mispricing. Peña's current three-game under streak aligns with his broader trend, indicating this isn't random variance but a systematic weakness. The sample size of 11 games provides adequate data for pattern recognition without being so large that the market has fully corrected. Most concerning for over bettors is the consistency - Peña has never strung together more than two consecutive overs in these spots, suggesting any positive regression faces structural headwinds. His profile appears particularly vulnerable when offensive expectations peak, making high-total games prime fade territory.

Betting Verdict

LEAN UNDER with MEDIUM confidence. The -0.6 differential and 27.3% over rate create legitimate betting value on Peña's hit unders in high-total games. Target spots where the line sits at 1.0 or higher, as his 0.45 average provides maximum edge. Primary risk is positive regression given the extreme under rate, but his consistent struggles in offensive environments suggest this trend has staying power.

3 OVERS (27.3%)
8 UNDERS
0% 50% breakeven 100%

Performance vs Line

Game Log (Last 11 Games)

Date Opp Line Actual +/- Result
2024-09-19 OPP 2.5 1.0 -1.5 UNDER
2024-09-12 OPP 2.5 0.0 -2.5 UNDER
2024-08-28 OPP 0.5 0.0 -0.5 UNDER
2024-08-25 OPP 0.5 1.0 +0.5 OVER
2024-08-17 OPP 1.5 0.0 -1.5 UNDER
2024-07-21 OPP 1.5 1.0 -0.5 UNDER
2024-07-13 OPP 0.5 0.0 -0.5 UNDER
2024-06-29 OPP 0.5 1.0 +0.5 OVER
2024-06-01 OPP 0.5 1.0 +0.5 OVER
2024-05-30 OPP 0.5 0.0 -0.5 UNDER
2024-04-02 OPP 0.5 0.0 -0.5 UNDER

Key Splits

Home vs Away

Home 16.7% Over
Away 40.0% Over

Favorite vs Underdog

Favorite 50.0% Over
Underdog 50.0% Over

Recent Trend

Last 5 20.0% Over
Last 10 30.0% Over

Find the Best Hits Prop Lines

Compare Jeremy Peña props across top sportsbooks.

Compare Sportsbooks

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Jeremy Peña's Hits prop record high total games?

Jeremy Peña's hits prop record in high total games is 3-8-0 over/under, hitting just 27.3% of overs. He averages 0.45 hits per game against a typical 1.05 line, creating a significant -0.6 differential that favors under bettors.

Should I bet OVER or UNDER on Jeremy Peña Hits high total games?

Bet under on Jeremy Peña's hits in high total games. His 27.3% over rate and -0.6 differential create clear value on the under side, with a 38.8% ROI demonstrating profitable opportunities when the market inflates expectations.

What's Jeremy Peña's average Hits high total games?

Jeremy Peña averages 0.45 hits per game in high total contests, falling well short of the typical 1.05 line. This -0.6 differential represents one of the larger gaps between performance and market expectation in this sample.

How reliable is this trend?

Target Jeremy Peña hit unders when the line is 1.0 or higher in high-total games. His consistent underperformance in offensive environments creates maximum edge when expectations peak, particularly given his inability to sustain over streaks beyond two games.

Methodology: This analysis covers 11 games from 2024-04-02 to 2024-09-19. O/U results use closing prop lines. ROI assumes -110 juice. Pushes excluded from percentages.