Jake McCarthy's Total Bases props present a dominant under trend with just 33.3% overs across 66 games, averaging 1.38 total bases against a 2.41 line. The -1.0 differential and current 15-game under streak signal a persistent pattern worth exploiting. Lean Under with medium confidence.
Expert Analysis
Jake McCarthy's Total Bases props reveal a systematic overvaluation by oddsmakers, creating consistent under value across his sample. The 1.38 average against a 2.41 line represents a massive -1.0 differential that speaks to fundamental mispricing rather than temporary variance. McCarthy's profile as a speed-first outfielder with limited power explains this disconnect—his value comes from stolen bases and defense, not extra-base hits. The 15-game under streak isn't an anomaly but rather the natural expression of his skill set meeting inflated expectations. Oddsmakers appear to be pricing McCarthy based on his athleticism and potential rather than his actual production patterns. His 22-44 record translates to profitable under betting at +27.3% ROI, suggesting the market hasn't properly adjusted to his true offensive ceiling. The consistency of this trend across 66 games indicates structural rather than situational factors. McCarthy's role as a bottom-of-the-order catalyst means he sees fewer premium pitches and RBI opportunities that typically drive total bases accumulation. Without split data showing variance by opponent quality or park factors, the trend appears universal, making it a reliable betting angle until the market corrects or McCarthy's approach fundamentally changes.
Betting Verdict
LEAN UNDER with MEDIUM confidence. The 1.03-unit gap between McCarthy's production and the betting line creates systematic value, supported by 66 games of data and a +27.3% under ROI. Target this prop when the line sits at 2.5 or higher, as McCarthy's speed-over-power profile consistently fails to reach inflated expectations. Main risk is a potential breakout performance or market correction that narrows the gap.
Performance vs Line
Game Log (Last 15 Games)
| Date | Opp | Line | Actual | +/- | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-25 | OPP | 3.5 | 1.0 | -2.5 | UNDER |
| 2024-09-23 | OPP | 2.5 | 1.0 | -1.5 | UNDER |
| 2024-09-22 | OPP | 3.5 | 1.0 | -2.5 | UNDER |
| 2024-09-20 | OPP | 3.5 | 0.0 | -3.5 | UNDER |
| 2024-09-19 | OPP | 4.5 | 1.0 | -3.5 | UNDER |
| 2024-09-18 | OPP | 2.5 | 2.0 | -0.5 | UNDER |
| 2024-09-15 | OPP | 4.5 | 1.0 | -3.5 | UNDER |
| 2024-09-14 | OPP | 4.5 | 1.0 | -3.5 | UNDER |
| 2024-09-13 | OPP | 1.5 | 0.0 | -1.5 | UNDER |
| 2024-09-11 | OPP | 4.5 | 0.0 | -4.5 | UNDER |
| 2024-09-10 | OPP | 4.5 | 1.0 | -3.5 | UNDER |
| 2024-09-06 | OPP | 1.5 | 0.0 | -1.5 | UNDER |
| 2024-09-05 | OPP | 2.5 | 0.0 | -2.5 | UNDER |
| 2024-09-04 | OPP | 1.5 | 1.0 | -0.5 | UNDER |
| 2024-09-03 | OPP | 1.5 | 0.0 | -1.5 | UNDER |
Key Splits
Home vs Away
Favorite vs Underdog
Recent Trend
Find the Best Total Bases Prop Lines
Compare Jake McCarthy props across top sportsbooks.
Compare SportsbooksFrequently Asked Questions
What is Jake McCarthy's Total Bases prop record all games?
Jake McCarthy has gone under his Total Bases prop in 44 of 66 games (66.7% under rate) for a 22-44-0 record. His consistent under performance has generated a +27.3% ROI for under bettors while over bettors face a -36.4% loss rate.
Should I bet OVER or UNDER on Jake McCarthy Total Bases all games?
Bet under on Jake McCarthy's Total Bases props. His 1.38 average creates a 1.03-unit gap below typical lines, supported by 66 games of data and a current 15-game under streak. The +27.3% under ROI demonstrates clear market inefficiency.
What's Jake McCarthy's average Total Bases all games?
Jake McCarthy averages 1.38 total bases per game against a typical 2.41 betting line, creating a -1.0 differential. This massive gap indicates oddsmakers consistently overvalue his power potential relative to his speed-first offensive profile and actual production patterns.
How reliable is this trend?
Target McCarthy's Total Bases unders when the line sits at 2.5 or higher, as the gap between his 1.38 average and inflated expectations creates maximum value. His profile works best as a systematic play rather than situational, given the universal nature of the trend.